A Federal High Court in Abuja will on Thursday, 3 June commence
hearing in a suit filed by the African Peoples Congress, APC, where the
party is asking the court to declare the registration of All Progressive
Congress in 2012 by the Independent National Election Commission, INEC,
as illegal.
The suit was at the instant of Chief O. M. Ikegwuonu
alongside 29 other members of the party who claim to be acting on behalf
of the African Peoples Congress.
African Peoples Congress had in
March 2013 approached INEC to be registered as a political party, but
was turned down which subsequently led to the association suing INEC and
seeking an order suspending or annulling any step taken by the
electoral umpire in registering any other association having the acronym
APC as a political party pending the hearing and determination of their
suit.
APC lawyer, Ikoro. N. Ikoro, told the court that the party
has two pending applications that are yet to be heard but he however,
withdrew one of the applications where the party sought to restrain INEC
from registering the All Progressives Congress as a political party,
since INEC had already registered it.
“This matter was pending in
court but INEC went ahead to register the All Progressives Congress. So,
it is no longer relevant” Ikoro told the court.
Subsequently, the trial Judge, Justice Gabriel Kolawole struck out the application, since INEC did not oppose the withdrawal.
On
the second application, Ikoro informed the court that it was ready for
hearing, but INEC’s lawyers led by Ibrahim Bawa objected to taking the
application.
“We are in court today to argue on the motion that
sought to restrain INEC from registering the All Progressive Congress
which has been struck out. The pending application now is that the court
declare as illegal the registration of APC as a political party by
INEC, since the matter was before the court.”
Ikoro had in the
court processes argued that “Section 66(a) of Nigerian Constitution
stated clearly that when a suit is pending before the court, all parties
in the matter should maintain status quo, awaiting the full
determination of the suit. He therefore pleaded with the court to
timeously determine the matter because it was in the national interest.
The court thereafter adjourned till Thursday, 3 June to hear that application.
No comments:
Post a Comment